BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Brazilian(Journal(of(Motor(Behavior(
(
https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v17i6.409
Special issue:
“In memory of Michael Turvey”
Had this anything to do with understanding real skill in real environments? As they say sometimes about the field of Quantum Mechanics,
the attitude was don’t worry about what it means. Just get on and do it. Which, of course, we did (Kelso, 1977).
However, Turvey’s paper and his ideas of coordinative structures aka functional synergies changed the furniture in the room, as
they say. For me, it was a completely new way to do science. I asked him to come out to the University of Iowa and give a series of
lectures, which were recorded and transcribed and later published as three chapters with his students, Hollis Fitch and Betty Tuller—with
beautiful graphics by someone called Claudia Carello (Turvey, Fitch & Tuller, 1982; Tuller, Turvey & Fitch, 1982; Fitch, Tuller & Turvey,
1982; see also Turvey & Carello, 1995). So, the plot as you can see, is thickening…
The Turvey lectures were in the spring of 1978 but did not appear in book form until 1982. By the Fall of 1978, I had moved to
Haskins Labs at Yale University and was working directly with Michael and Carol Fowler and Betty Tuller and many other wonderful
scientists and brilliant students. Practically speaking, by the way, Michael didn’t have anything to do with my going to Haskins (my
students and I at Iowa had a paper on voluntary two-handed movements about to appear in Science (Kelso, Southard & Goodman, 1979)
and tenured Associate Professorships were on offer at Oregon and USC) but in my mind as well as my heart, of course he did. Big time.
Haskins offered the opportunity to do full-time research, which I loved. There we went after Michael’s coordinative structures in studies of
both speech and limb movements. For the latter, I brought my own apparatus for studying bimanual coordination and perturbations
thereof (Kelso & Holt, 1980). For speech, the technical expertise at Haskins was unsurpassed. Anywhere in the world. So we pursued, as
Michael would say “how the bits and pieces gang together” when a person speaks or moves their body. That simple phrase of
Michael’s—how you can take a lot of things and have them gang together to form an organization—a process now understood as self-
organization--turned out to have even greater ramifications. Unforeseen at the time. That’s another story (Kelso, 1995; 2022; Turvey,
1990). But none of it—finding coordinative structures in speech production, discoveries of phase transitions in human hand movements
(and indeed eventually in the human brain), the HKB model and all its symmetry breaking extensions that spawned the field of
Coordination Dynamics—from Matter to Movement to Mind, Social interactions and Beyond…Entire fields and scientific approaches, call
them what you may--Task Dynamics, Gestural Dynamics, Articulatory Phonetics, Behavioral Dynamics, Ecological Dynamics, DST, The
Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science, 4E Cognition, Dynamic Touch, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera as the King of Siam used to
say…None of it would have happened without Michael Turvey’s insights, understandings and writings. None of it. Simple as that. That’s
really all I came here to say. Except, as an Irishman, for a parting glass. In his Essay or Epistle on Man, Alexander Pope said of Newton:
“Could he, whose rules the rapid comet bind, Describe or fix one movement of his mind?” The great scientist, Michael Turvey took us
much closer to answering Pope’s question.
REFERENCES
1. Fitch, H. L., Tuller, B., & Turvey, M.T. (1982). The Bernstein Perspective: III. Tuning of coordinative structures with special reference to perception.
In Kelso, J.A.S. (Ed.), Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Fowler, C.A. & Turvey, M.T. (1978). Skill acquisition: An event approach with reference to searching for the optimum of a function of many variables.
In G.E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press.
3. Kelso, J.A.S. (1977). Motor control mechanisms underlying human movement reproduction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception
and Performance, 3, 529-543.
4. Kelso, J.A.S. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5. Kelso, J.A.S. (2022). On the Coordination Dynamics of (Animate) Moving Bodies. Journal of Physics (Complexity Section). doi: 10.1088/2632-
072X/ac7caf
6. Kelso, J.A.S. & Holt, K.G. (1980). Exploring a vibratory systems analysis of human movement production. Journal of Neurophysiology, 43,
1183-1196.
7. Kelso, J.A.S., Southard, D., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science, 203, 1029-1031.
8. Tuller, B., Turvey, M.T., & Fitch, H.L. (1982). The Bernstein Perspective: II. The concept of muscle linkage or coordinative structure. In Kelso, J.A.S.
(Ed.), Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Turvey, M.T. (1977). Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision, In R.E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing:
Toward an ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
10. Turvey, M.T. (1990). Coordination. American Psychologist, 45(8), 938-953.
11. Turvey, M.T. & Carello, C. (1995). Dynamic touch. In Perception of Space and Motion (Eds. W. Epstein & S. Rogers), New York, Academic Press,
pp.401-490.
12. Turvey, M.T., Fitch, H. L., & Tuller, B. (1982). The Bernstein Perspective: I. The problems of degrees of freedom and context-conditioned variability.
In Kelso, J.A.S. (Ed.), Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.